NASA Eliminates The 100% Consensus For Global Cooling

Real Science

The EPA used to have this inconvenient document on their web site, showing about 0.2C cooling from 1940 to the 1960’s

ScreenHunter_144 May. 26 04.06

ScreenHunter_138 May. 26 03.12

Figure 2-1. Global temperature trend for past century based on J. Hansen 1981

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/effects/downloads/Challenge_chapter2.pdf

At the time, scientists unanimously agreed that the world was cooling.

ScreenHunter_147 May. 26 04.26

SCIENTISTS AGREE WORLD IS COLDER – NYTimes.com

That cooling didn’t fit the global warming agenda, so NASA simply got rid of it. They now show warming after 1950.

Fig.A2

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

I digitized the 1981 graph and calculated the alterations NASA has made to their own global temperature record since 1981. They progressively cooled the past to exaggerate warming, with most of the data tampering coming between 1940 and 1960 – in order to eliminate the post 1940 cooling trend.

ScreenHunter_146 May. 26 04.21

When you are saving the planet, sometimes you just have to alter the data. Gaia demands it.

View original post

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under global warming

3 responses to “NASA Eliminates The 100% Consensus For Global Cooling

  1. Gee n opsoming asb van wat jy glo is die stand van sake

    • 1) Die klimaat verander met reëlmatige ystydperke en warmer tussenperiodes – sedert die ontstaan van die Sonnestelsel – sonder toedoen van die mens.
      2) Die Aarde is tans in ‘n verwarmende staat ná die laaste ystydperk – waartydens daar episodes van warmer en kouer voorgekom het – ook lank voor ons enige invloed kon uitoefen.
      3) Volgens ontleding van “ice cores” volg CO2 inhoud van die atmosfeer die temperatuur met sowat 800 jaar: dws as dit warmer word, volg daar meer CO2 – daar is dus ‘n korrelasie maar nie ‘n kausale korrelasie nie in die sin dat CO2 verwarming veroorsaak nie.
      4) Die afgelope 17 jaar was daar nog geen verdere verwarming nie hoewel CO2 vlakke styg.
      5) Histories oor geologiese tye is daar geen korrelasie tussen tempertuur en CO2 nie.
      6) AL die rekenaar modelle waarop voorspellings gebaseer word verskil van werklike metings deur verwarming te oordryf. Die huidige “stilstand” is deur geen van die modelle voorspel nie.
      7) Die Son se invloed word geheel en al geïgnoreer.
      8) Die IPCC se verslae is hoogs twyfelagtig (Google die joernalis Donna Laframboise)
      9) Ek kan nog ‘n week lank so aangaan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s